What Wears Out
Mercedes-Benz · Fully electric · 593 inspections in 2024 · Rank 35 of 81DVSA MOT analysis

Body and structure defects fail the Mercedes-Benz eVito 6.9× as often as they fail a petrol or diesel car

593 inspections in a single year make the EVITO a modestly documented electric car in the data. Tyres cause 28.2% of its failures; body take 6.9× the share they take on petrol and diesel cars of the same age.

FIGURE 1 // WHERE IT WEARSMercedes-Benz eVito
TYRES 28.2%(1.2× the petrol/diesel share)BODY 28.2%(6.9× the petrol/diesel share)BRAKES 20.4%(1.1× the petrol/diesel share)

Top three failure systems, annotated from 54 failed first-time tests. Arrows point to where the defect is found on the car.

First-time test findings

The three-year vs four-year picture

AT THREE YEARS OLD6.7%

EVITO failure rate. Petrol cars of the same age fail 8.2%.

AT FOUR YEARS OLD28.3%

EVITO failure rate, against 8.9% for petrol.

At three years old the Mercedes-Benz eVito fails 6.7% of the time, under the 8.2% of a petrol car the same age. By 4 years that reaches 28.3%. Tyres cause 28.2% of its failures.

FIGURE 2 // SILL AND UNDERBODY27 certificates in 2024

Corrosion where it should not be yet

Body take 28.2% of the defects that fail this car, 6.9× the share seen on petrol and diesel cars of the same age. The most common item in that group is "A transmission shaft constant velocity joint boot missing or no longer prevents the ingress of dirt etc", recorded 27 times in 2024.

A TRANSMISSION SHAFT CONST27 CERTIFICATES
SECTION // BODY CONCENTRATIONYear 4 crossover

Where the curve bends

The crossover with petrol happens around year 4. From there the EVITO's failure rate climbs faster than the petrol fleet, and the defect list explains why.

DEFECT CONCENTRATION IN FAILED TESTS:
EVITO body share28.2%
Petrol and diesel average4.1%

The single most common item on a EVITO certificate is "A transmission shaft constant velocity joint boot missing or no longer prevents the ingress of dirt etc", recorded 27 times.

Source: DVSA MOT defect items, 2024 test year.
Buyer's protocolPre-purchase checklist

What to check

Check tyre age and tread across the full width, inner edge included. Electric cars wear tyres faster; a cheap mismatched set on a used car tells you how it was run. Ask when the brakes were last stripped and cleaned. Regenerative braking barely wears the pads, so discs and calipers corrode and seize instead. Ask for the full MOT history by registration on the free DVSA service: advisories are next year's failures.

3 inspection points:
✓ Tyre inner-edge wear and age
✓ Rear caliper drag and disc lip
✓ Free DVSA MOT history check
FIGURE 3 // FAILURE RATE BY AGEvs petrol, diesel and all electric cars

    Points hidden where fewer than 50 cars of that age were tested. Dashed lines are the same-age petrol and diesel fleets.

    Data sheet
    Inspections
    593
    Passed
    524
    Failed
    54
    Passed after repair
    15
    Failure rate
    9.1% (all EV 12.0%)
    Average age
    3.1 years
    Best year
    3 yrs · 6.7%
    Worst year
    4 yrs · 28.3%
    Top cause
    Tyres 28.2%
    TABLE 1 // WHAT FAILS, BY SYSTEMshare of failing defects
    SystemThis car (mark = petrol/diesel)Sharevs petrol/diesel
    Tyres
    28.2% in line
    Suspension
    2.9% 4.7× less
    Brakes
    20.4% in line
    Visibility
    9.7% in line
    Lighting
    5.8% 2.8× less
    Steering
    0.0% in line
    Body
    28.2% 6.9× more
    TABLE 2 // TOP DEFECTS ON THE CERTIFICATE
    1. A transmission shaft constant velocity joint boot missing or no longer prevents the ingress of dirt etc27
    2. A tyre cords visible or damaged11
    3. Parking brake efficiency below minimum requirement8
    4. A tyre seriously damaged8
    5. Tyre tread depth not in accordance with the requirements6
    6. Number plate does not conform to the specified requirements4

    Wording as printed by the tester, from the DVSA inspection manual.

    Advertisement
    ad slot: in-article
    Where it holds up
    • Suspension fail less often than on petrol and diesel cars (2.9% of defects vs 13.6%)
    • Lighting fail less often than on petrol and diesel cars (5.8% of defects vs 16.5%)
    • Steering fail less often than on petrol and diesel cars (0.0% of defects vs 3.1%)
    • At three years old it fails 6.7% of the time, below the 8.2% of petrol cars the same age
    Where it fails
    • Body take a bigger share of failures than on petrol and diesel cars of the same age (28.2% vs 4.1%)
    VERSIONS SEEN IN THE TESTSas recorded
    • EVITO PROGRESSIVE293
    • EVITO TOURER PRO256
    • EVITO TOURER PREMIUM28
    • EVITO TOURER11
    • EVITO 66 PROGRESSIVE5
    OWNER REPORTS // MATCHED TO RECORDED DEFECTS0 read · 0 matched
    No owner discussion has been matched to this car's recorded defects yet. Reports are re-collected every quarter; the figures on this page do not depend on them.

    Summaries written by us, never quotes; every entry links to its source. Owner reports have no denominator and never feed the failure rate.

    Three things the data shows
    • 593 inspections in 2024 make this one of the adequately-documented electric cars in the data.
    • Body take 6.9× the share of failures they take on petrol and diesel cars of the same age.
    • Failure rate rises from 6.7% at 3 years to 28.3% at 4: a steep ageing curve.
    LIMITS // WHAT THE INSPECTION DOES NOT TELL YOU

    No battery health, no motor, no charging performance. The test covers brakes, suspension, steering, tyres, lights, visibility and structure. A car with a badly degraded battery passes as long as it stops and steers. Read this page as evidence about the chassis, not the powertrain. Cars are tested from their third year, so the newest model years are missing; every figure carries its sample size for that reason. Full methodology.

    Advertisement
    ad slot: end of article
    By What Wears Out editorial team. Data: DVSA anonymised MOT tests, 2024 test year, OGL v3.0. Updated .
    Methodology • Mercedes-Benz eVito dossier