Top three failure systems, annotated from 519 failed first-time tests. Arrows point to where the defect is found on the car.
Tyres are 76% of everything that fails a Mercedes-Benz EQA
5,119 inspections in a single year make the EQA one of the better-documented electric car. Tyres cause 75.7% of its failures; tyres take 3.2× the share they take on petrol and diesel cars of the same age.
The three-year picture
EQA failure rate. Petrol cars of the same age fail 8.2%.
All electric cars in the data.
At three years old the Mercedes-Benz EQA fails 10.2% of the time, over the 8.2% of a petrol car the same age. Tyres cause 75.7% of its failures.
The tyre that wears from the inside
Tyres take 75.7% of the defects that fail this car, 3.2× the share seen on petrol and diesel cars of the same age. The most common item in that group is "A tyre seriously damaged", recorded 382 times in 2024.
Where the curve bends
The crossover with petrol happens around year 3. From there the EQA's failure rate climbs faster than the petrol fleet, and the defect list explains why.
What to check
Check tyre age and tread across the full width, inner edge included. Electric cars wear tyres faster; a cheap mismatched set on a used car tells you how it was run. Trivial to fix, but a car advertised with worn wipers and a fresh failure certificate tells you how it was maintained. Ask for the full MOT history by registration on the free DVSA service: advisories are next year's failures.
Points hidden where fewer than 50 cars of that age were tested. Dashed lines are the same-age petrol and diesel fleets.
- Inspections
- 5,119
- Passed
- 4,502
- Failed
- 519
- Passed after repair
- 98
- Failure rate
- 10.1% (all EV 12.0%)
- Average age
- 3.0 years
- Best year
- 3 yrs · 10.2%
- Worst year
- 3 yrs · 10.2%
- Top cause
- Tyres 75.7%
| System | This car (mark = petrol/diesel) | Share | vs petrol/diesel |
|---|---|---|---|
| Tyres | 75.7% | 3.2× more | |
| Suspension | 2.9% | 4.7× less | |
| Brakes | 1.5% | 12.5× less | |
| Visibility | 12.9% | in line | |
| Lighting | 2.5% | 6.6× less | |
| Steering | 0.1% | 31.0× less | |
| Body | 1.5% | 2.7× less |
- A tyre seriously damaged382
- Tyre tread depth not in accordance with the requirements157
- A tyre cords visible or damaged123
- Wiper blade missing or obviously not clearing the windscreen46
- Windscreen or window damaged or seriously discoloured but not adversely affecting driver's view28
- Wiper blade defective21
Wording as printed by the tester, from the DVSA inspection manual.
- Suspension fail less often than on petrol and diesel cars (2.9% of defects vs 13.6%)
- Brakes fail less often than on petrol and diesel cars (1.5% of defects vs 18.7%)
- Lighting fail less often than on petrol and diesel cars (2.5% of defects vs 16.5%)
- Steering fail less often than on petrol and diesel cars (0.1% of defects vs 3.1%)
- Tyres take a bigger share of failures than on petrol and diesel cars of the same age (75.7% vs 23.7%)
- At three years old it fails 10.2% of the time, above the 8.2% of petrol cars the same age
- EQA 250 AMG LINE3,038
- EQA 250 AMG LINE PREMIUM1,002
- EQA 350 AMG LINE 4MATIC351
- EQA 250 SPORT341
- EQA 250 AMG LINE PREMIUM +240
- EQA 350 AMG LNE PREMIUM 4MATIC58
- EQA 300 AMG LNE PREMIUM 4MATIC29
- EQA 300 AMG LINE 4MATIC28
Summaries written by us, never quotes; every entry links to its source. Owner reports have no denominator and never feed the failure rate.
- 5,119 inspections in 2024 make this one of the best-documented electric cars in the data.
- Tyres take 3.2× the share of failures they take on petrol and diesel cars of the same age.
- It ranks 43 of 81 electric cars by first-time failure rate.
No battery health, no motor, no charging performance. The test covers brakes, suspension, steering, tyres, lights, visibility and structure. A car with a badly degraded battery passes as long as it stops and steers. Read this page as evidence about the chassis, not the powertrain. Cars are tested from their third year, so the newest model years are missing; every figure carries its sample size for that reason. Full methodology.