Top three failure systems, annotated from 2 failed first-time tests. Arrows point to where the defect is found on the car.
The BYD Atto has the second-lowest MOT failure rate of any electric car tested
124 inspections in a single year make the ATTO the best-documented electric car in the data. Tyres cause 66.7% of its failures; tyres take 2.8× the share they take on petrol and diesel cars of the same age.
First-time failure rate
Overall first-time failure rate.
All electric cars in the data.
The BYD Atto fails 1.6% of first-time inspections. Tyres cause 66.7% of its failures.
The tyre that wears from the inside
Tyres take 66.7% of the defects that fail this car, 2.8× the share seen on petrol and diesel cars of the same age. The most common item in that group is "Tyre tread depth not in accordance with the requirements", recorded 2 times in 2024.
Where it concentrates
The ATTO stays under the petrol fleet at every age we can measure. What it does fail on is unusually concentrated.
What to check
Check tyre age and tread across the full width, inner edge included. Electric cars wear tyres faster; a cheap mismatched set on a used car tells you how it was run. Ask for the full MOT history by registration on the free DVSA service: advisories are next year's failures.
Points hidden where fewer than 50 cars of that age were tested. Dashed lines are the same-age petrol and diesel fleets.
- Inspections
- 124
- Passed
- 120
- Failed
- 2
- Passed after repair
- 2
- Failure rate
- 1.6% (all EV 12.0%)
- Average age
- 0.0 years
- Top cause
- Tyres 66.7%
| System | This car (mark = petrol/diesel) | Share | vs petrol/diesel |
|---|---|---|---|
| Tyres | 66.7% | 2.8× more | |
| Suspension | 0.0% | in line | |
| Brakes | 0.0% | in line | |
| Visibility | 0.0% | in line | |
| Lighting | 0.0% | in line | |
| Steering | 0.0% | in line | |
| Body | 0.0% | in line |
- Tyre tread depth not in accordance with the requirements2
- Seat belt retractor not functioning as intended1
Wording as printed by the tester, from the DVSA inspection manual.
- Suspension fail less often than on petrol and diesel cars (0.0% of defects vs 13.6%)
- Brakes fail less often than on petrol and diesel cars (0.0% of defects vs 18.7%)
- Visibility fail less often than on petrol and diesel cars (0.0% of defects vs 11.9%)
- Lighting fail less often than on petrol and diesel cars (0.0% of defects vs 16.5%)
- Tyres take a bigger share of failures than on petrol and diesel cars of the same age (66.7% vs 23.7%)
- ATTO 372
- ATTO 3 DESIGN52
Summaries written by us, never quotes; every entry links to its source. Owner reports have no denominator and never feed the failure rate.
- 124 inspections in 2024 make this one of the adequately-documented electric cars in the data.
- Tyres take 2.8× the share of failures they take on petrol and diesel cars of the same age.
- It ranks 2 of 81 electric cars by first-time failure rate.
No battery health, no motor, no charging performance. The test covers brakes, suspension, steering, tyres, lights, visibility and structure. A car with a badly degraded battery passes as long as it stops and steers. Read this page as evidence about the chassis, not the powertrain. Cars are tested from their third year, so the newest model years are missing; every figure carries its sample size for that reason. Full methodology.